This chapter defines a trading desk, which is the level at which model approval is granted.
For the purposes of market risk capital calculations, a trading desk is a group of traders or trading accounts that implements a well defined business strategy operating within a clear risk management structure.
Trading desks are defined by the bank but subject to the regulatory approval of the supervisor for capital purposes.
Within this supervisory approved trading desk structure, banks may further define operational subdesks without the need for supervisory approval. These subdesks would be for internal operational purposes only and would not be used in the market risk capital framework.
The key attributes of a trading desk are as follows:
The head trader must have direct oversight of the group of traders or trading accounts.
Each trader or each trading account in the trading desk must have a clearly defined specialty (or specialities).
Economics: what is the economics behind the strategy (eg trading on the shape of the yield curve)? How much of the activities are customer driven? Does it entail trade origination and structuring, or execution services, or both?
Primary activities: what is the list of permissible instruments and, out of this list, which are the instruments most frequently traded?
Trading/hedging strategies: how would these instruments be hedged, what are the expected slippages and mismatches of hedges, and what is the expected holding period for positions?
well defined trading limits or directional exposures at the trading desk level that are based on the appropriate market risk metric (eg sensitivity of credit spread risk and/or jump-to-default for a credit trading desk), or just overall notional limits; and
well defined trader mandates.
The bank must prepare, evaluate, and have available for supervisors the following for all trading desks:
Any foreign exchange or commodity positions held in the banking book must be included in the market risk capital requirement as set out in MAR11.1. For regulatory capital calculation purposes, these positions will be treated as if they were held on notional trading desks within the trading book.
FAQ1, FAQ2| FAQ1 | How should the requirement for a “notional trading desk” be interpreted for banking book FX and commodities positions? A “notional trading desk” is a trading desk that need not have traders or trading accounts assigned to it, and need not meet the qualitative trading desk requirements set out in MAR12. Banks that wish to use the internal models approach (IMA) to measure the FX or commodity risk of such “notional trading desks” must take either or both of the following actions: -transfer all or part of banking book FX and commodity risks to another trading desk via intra-trading book internal risk transfers (IRTs) (where trading desk requirements would continue to apply as appropriate for that desk), and/or -apply for IMA approval for the notional trading desk. In this case, the notional desk only needs to meet the quantitative trading desk requirements. |
| FAQ2 | Does the standard permit certain traders (ie global treasury desk heads or department heads) to have ownership and responsibilities in both trading book and banking book portfolios? Yes. |
This standard describes the scope of application of the Basel Framework.
This standard describes the criteria that bank capital instruments must meet to be eligible to satisfy the Basel capital requirements, as well as necessary regulatory adjustments and transitional arrangements.
This standard describes the framework for risk-based capital requirements.
This standard describes how to calculate capital requirements for credit risk.
This standard describes how to calculate capital requirements for market risk and credit valuation adjustment risk.
This standard describes how to calculate capital requirements for operational risk.
This standard describes the simple, transparent, non-risk-based leverage ratio. This measure intends to restrict the build-up of leverage in the banking sector and reinforce the risk-based requirements with a simple, non-risk-based "backstop" measure.
This standard describes the Liquidity Coverage Ratio, a measure which promotes the short-term resilience of a bank's liquidity risk profile.
The net stable funding ratio requires banks to maintain a stable funding profile in relation to the composition of their assets and off-balance-sheet activities.
Large exposures regulation limits the maximum loss that a bank could face in the event of a sudden counterparty failure to a level that does not endanger the bank's solvency. This standard requires banks to measure their exposures to a single counterparty or a group of connected counterparties and limit the size of large exposures in relation to their capital.
This standard establishes minimum standards for margin requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives. Such requirements reduce systemic risk with respect to non-standardised derivatives by reducing contagion and spillover risks and promoting central clearing.
The Pillar 2 supervisory review process ensures that banks have adequate capital and liquidity to support all the risks in their business, especially with respect to risks not fully captured by the Pillar 1 process, and encourages good risk management.
This standard sets out disclosure requirements, which aim to encourage market discipline.
The Basel Core Principles provide a comprehensive standard for establishing a sound foundation for the regulation, supervision, governance and risk management of the banking sector.