Skip to main content

PFMI implementation database

This is an online data repository of jurisdictions' implementation measures for the Principles for financial market infrastructures and associated CPMI and IOSCO assessment principle ratings. It complements the Level 2 assessment programme on the extent to which jurisdictions' implementation measures are complete and consistent with the international standards for payment systems, central securities depositories, securities settlement systems, central counterparties and trade repositories.

Note that authorities may have updated their rules, regulations and policies since the assessment. For current implementation measures, please contact the relevant authority.

Please provide first name.
Looks good!
United States PS
US-FRB
  • Principle ID 2.3
  • Rating Consistent

Implementation measure cut-off date: 30-May-2019
Assessment rating date: 29-Mar-2018

Principle

An FMI should have governance arrangements that are clear and transparent, promote the safety and efficiency of the FMI, and support the stability of the broader financial system, other relevant public interest considerations, and the objectives of relevant stakeholders.

Implementation measures

Regulation HH (12 CFR § 234.3(a)(2)(iv)(B) and (E)) PSR policy Principle 2: Governance

United States PS
US-FRB
  • Principle ID 2.4
  • Rating Consistent

Implementation measure cut-off date: 30-May-2019
Assessment rating date: 29-Mar-2018

Principle

An FMI should have governance arrangements that are clear and transparent, promote the safety and efficiency of the FMI, and support the stability of the broader financial system, other relevant public interest considerations, and the objectives of relevant stakeholders.

Implementation measures

Regulation HH (12 CFR § 234.3(a)(2)(iv)(C) and (D)) PSR policy Principle 2: Governance

Assessment comments (key conclusions and recommendations)

Regulation HH does not require that the board of a payment system have suitable members with appropriate incentives to fulfil its multiple roles.

United States PS
US-FRB
  • Principle ID 2.5
  • Rating Consistent

Implementation measure cut-off date: 30-May-2019
Assessment rating date: 29-Mar-2018

Principle

An FMI should have governance arrangements that are clear and transparent, promote the safety and efficiency of the FMI, and support the stability of the broader financial system, other relevant public interest considerations, and the objectives of relevant stakeholders.

Implementation measures

Regulation HH (12 CFR § 234.3(a)(2)(iv)(B) and (G)) PSR policy Principle 2: Governance

United States PS
US-FRB
  • Principle ID 2.6
  • Rating Consistent

Implementation measure cut-off date: 30-May-2019
Assessment rating date: 29-Mar-2018

Principle

An FMI should have governance arrangements that are clear and transparent, promote the safety and efficiency of the FMI, and support the stability of the broader financial system, other relevant public interest considerations, and the objectives of relevant stakeholders.

Implementation measures

Regulation HH (12 CFR § 234.3(a)(2)(iv)(F), (H), and (I)) PSR policy Principle 2: Governance

United States PS
US-FRB
  • Principle ID 2.7
  • Rating Consistent

Implementation measure cut-off date: 30-May-2019
Assessment rating date: 29-Mar-2018

Principle

An FMI should have governance arrangements that are clear and transparent, promote the safety and efficiency of the FMI, and support the stability of the broader financial system, other relevant public interest considerations, and the objectives of relevant stakeholders.

Implementation measures

Regulation HH (12 CFR § 234.3(a)(2)(iv)(J)) PSR policy Principle 2: Governance

United States PS
US-FRB
  • Principle ID 21.0
  • Rating Consistent

Implementation measure cut-off date: 30-May-2019
Assessment rating date: 29-Mar-2018

Principle

An FMI should be efficient and effective in meeting the requirements of its participants and the markets it serves.

Implementation measures

Regulation HH (12 CFR § 234.3(a)(21)(i) PSR policy Principle 21: Efficiency and effectiveness

United States PS
US-FRB
  • Principle ID 21.1
  • Rating Consistent

Implementation measure cut-off date: 30-May-2019
Assessment rating date: 29-Mar-2018

Principle

An FMI should be efficient and effective in meeting the requirements of its participants and the markets it serves.

Implementation measures

Regulation HH (12 CFR § 234.3(a)(21)(i) PSR policy Principle 21: Efficiency and effectiveness

United States PS
US-FRB
  • Principle ID 21.2
  • Rating Consistent

Implementation measure cut-off date: 30-May-2019
Assessment rating date: 29-Mar-2018

Principle

An FMI should be efficient and effective in meeting the requirements of its participants and the markets it serves.

Implementation measures

Regulation HH (12 CFR § 234.3(a)(21)(ii) PSR policy Principle 21: Efficiency and effectiveness

United States PS
US-FRB
  • Principle ID 21.3
  • Rating Consistent

Implementation measure cut-off date: 30-May-2019
Assessment rating date: 29-Mar-2018

Principle

An FMI should be efficient and effective in meeting the requirements of its participants and the markets it serves.

Implementation measures

Regulation HH (12 CFR § 234.3(a)(21)(iii) PSR policy Principle 21: Efficiency and effectiveness

United States PS
US-FRB
  • Principle ID 22.0
  • Rating Consistent

Implementation measure cut-off date: 30-May-2019
Assessment rating date: 29-Mar-2018

Principle

An FMI should use, or at a minimum accommodate, relevant internationally accepted communication procedures and standards in order to facilitate efficient payment, clearing, settlement, and recording.

Implementation measures

Regulation HH (12 CFR § 234.3(a)(22) PSR policy Principle 22: Communication procedures and standards

Description of filters

Jurisdiction

This filter limits the search results to selected jurisdictions. The available jurisdictions represent assessments that have been completed to date. The table below provides also a pdf of key conclusions and recommendations for all Principles of a given jurisdiction.

Laptop displaying a database on screen, a mobile phone, and a notebook on top of a table

FMI type

This filter limits the search results to the selected FMI types. FMIs may be subject to different regulatory, supervisory and oversight regimes depending on their organisation, function and design.

PS: Payment system

A set of instruments, procedures and rules for the transfer of funds between or among participants; the system includes the participants and the entity operating the arrangement.

CSD/SSS: Central securities depository / Securities settlement system

CSDs are entities that provide securities accounts, central safekeeping services and asset services, which may include the administration of corporate actions and redemptions, and play an important role in helping to ensure the integrity of securities issues (that securities are not accidentally or fraudulently created or destroyed or their details changed). The precise activities of a CSD vary based on jurisdiction and market practices.

SSS are entities that enable securities to be transferred and settled by book entry according to a set of predetermined multilateral rules. Such systems allow transfers of securities either free of payment or against payment. Typically, a CSD also operates an SSS.

CCP: Central counterparty

An entity that interposes itself between counterparties to contracts traded in one or more financial markets, becoming the buyer to every seller and the seller to every buyer and thereby ensuring the performance of open contracts.

TR: Trade repository

An entity that maintains a centralised electronic record (database) of transaction data.

Principle or key consideration ID

This filter limits the search results to selected principles and key considerations.   Each principle includes a headline standard and a list of key considerations that further explain the headline standard.  The principles are listed below. A detailed list of key considerations is available in the CPMI-IOSCO Principles for financial market infrastructures.

Principle rating

This filter limits the search results to selected principle rating(s) used in the L2 assessments. The ratings reflect conditions at the time of the assessment, and are built on key conclusions that reflect CPMI and IOSCO's collective expert judgment regarding the impact of identified gaps and/or shortcomings. Ratings are determined for each principle after the jurisdiction's legislative and regulatory framework, including policy statements, as relevant, was compared against the corresponding content of the PFMI.

The jurisdiction’s regulatory framework is consistent with the Principle. The assessment has identified no gaps or shortcomings, or only a few gaps and/or shortcomings that have no material impact on completeness and/or consistency.

The jurisdiction’s regulatory framework is broadly consistent with the Principle. The assessment has identified gaps and/or shortcomings that have a minor impact on completeness and/or consistency.

The jurisdiction’s regulatory framework is partly consistent with the Principle. The assessment has identified gaps and/or shortcomings that have a significant impact on completeness and/or consistency.

The jurisdiction’s regulatory framework is not consistent with the Principle. The assessment has identified gaps and/or shortcomings that have a major impact on completeness and/or consistency.

This status corresponds to the case where no relevant FMI exists that is within the scope of the Principles. A rating of “NA” will be indicated only if no relevant regulatory measures are being taken and no such FMI is expected to develop within the jurisdiction.

You might also be interested in