This is an online data repository of jurisdictions' implementation measures for the Principles for financial market infrastructures and associated CPMI and IOSCO assessment principle ratings. It complements the Level 2 assessment programme on the extent to which jurisdictions' implementation measures are complete and consistent with the international standards for payment systems, central securities depositories, securities settlement systems, central counterparties and trade repositories.
Note that authorities may have updated their rules, regulations and policies since the assessment. For current implementation measures, please contact the relevant authority.
Implementation measure cut-off date: 15-May-2022
Assessment rating date: 30-May-2019
Principle
An FMI should identify the plausible sources of operational risk, both internal and external, and mitigate their impact through the use of appropriate systems, policies, procedures, and controls. Systems should be designed to ensure a high degree of security and operational reliability and should have adequate, scalable capacity. Business continuity management should aim for timely recovery of operations and fulfilment of the FMI’s obligations, including in the event of a wide-scale or major disruption.
Implementation measures
CMB Policy Statement No.10/328
Assessment comments (key conclusions and recommendations)
It is recommended that the CMB ensures the implementation of CMB Policy Statement 10/328 by developing a clear and comprehensive oversight framework allowing the CMB to assess supervised FMIs against PFMIs and induce change supporting PFMI implementation.
Implementation measure cut-off date: 15-May-2022
Assessment rating date: 30-May-2019
Principle
An FMI should identify the plausible sources of operational risk, both internal and external, and mitigate their impact through the use of appropriate systems, policies, procedures, and controls. Systems should be designed to ensure a high degree of security and operational reliability and should have adequate, scalable capacity. Business continuity management should aim for timely recovery of operations and fulfilment of the FMI’s obligations, including in the event of a wide-scale or major disruption.
Implementation measures
CMB Policy Statement No.10/328
Assessment comments (key conclusions and recommendations)
It is recommended that the CMB ensures the implementation of CMB Policy Statement 10/328 by developing a clear and comprehensive oversight framework allowing the CMB to assess supervised FMIs against PFMIs and induce change supporting PFMI implementation.
Implementation measure cut-off date: 15-May-2022
Assessment rating date: 30-May-2019
Principle
An FMI should identify the plausible sources of operational risk, both internal and external, and mitigate their impact through the use of appropriate systems, policies, procedures, and controls. Systems should be designed to ensure a high degree of security and operational reliability and should have adequate, scalable capacity. Business continuity management should aim for timely recovery of operations and fulfilment of the FMI’s obligations, including in the event of a wide-scale or major disruption.
Implementation measures
CMB Policy Statement No.10/328 CMB MKK Regulation Article 9 "Duties and authorities of the MKK" Article 10 "Terms of Operation" Article 11 "Operation rules and principles" CMB Communiqué on Management of Information Systems (VII-128.9) Article 5 “Establishment and Implementation of Management of Information Systems” Paragraph 2 Article 6 “Information Security Policy”
Implementation measure cut-off date: 15-May-2022
Assessment rating date: 30-May-2019
Principle
An FMI should identify the plausible sources of operational risk, both internal and external, and mitigate their impact through the use of appropriate systems, policies, procedures, and controls. Systems should be designed to ensure a high degree of security and operational reliability and should have adequate, scalable capacity. Business continuity management should aim for timely recovery of operations and fulfilment of the FMI’s obligations, including in the event of a wide-scale or major disruption.
Implementation measures
CMB Policy Statement No.10/328 CMB Communiqué on Management of Information Systems (VII-128.9) Article 7 “Supervision and Responsibility of Senior Management” Paragraph 6 Article 26 “Continuity of Information Systems”
Assessment comments (key conclusions and recommendations)
It is recommended that the CMB considers requirements in relation to the resumption of operations within two hours following disruptive events and to complete settlement by the end of the day of the disruption, even in the event of a wide-scale or major disruption.
Implementation measure cut-off date: 15-May-2022
Assessment rating date: 30-May-2019
Principle
An FMI should identify the plausible sources of operational risk, both internal and external, and mitigate their impact through the use of appropriate systems, policies, procedures, and controls. Systems should be designed to ensure a high degree of security and operational reliability and should have adequate, scalable capacity. Business continuity management should aim for timely recovery of operations and fulfilment of the FMI’s obligations, including in the event of a wide-scale or major disruption.
Implementation measures
CMB Policy Statement No.10/328
Assessment comments (key conclusions and recommendations)
It is recommended that the CMB ensures the implementation of the CMB Policy Statement 10/328 by developing a clear and comprehensive oversight framework allowing the CMB to assess supervised FMIs against PFMIs and induce change supporting PFMI implementation.
Implementation measure cut-off date: 15-May-2022
Assessment rating date: 30-May-2019
Principle
An FMI should have objective, risk-based, and publicly disclosed criteria for participation, which permit fair and open access.
Implementation measures
CMB Policy Statement No.10/328 CML Article 13 "Dematerialisation of capital market instruments" CMB MKK Regulation Article 20 “MKK participants” Article 21 "Membership terms" Article 22 “Acceptance to membership” Article 23 “Leaving membership” Article 24 "Temporary suspension or revocation of membership" Article 25 "Participant's responsibilities, operation principles and measures to be applied” Dematerialization Communiqué
Implementation measure cut-off date: 15-May-2022
Assessment rating date: 30-May-2019
Principle
An FMI should have objective, risk-based, and publicly disclosed criteria for participation, which permit fair and open access.
Implementation measures
CMB Policy Statement No.10/328 CML Article 13 "Dematerialisation of capital market instruments" CMB MKK Regulation Article 20 “MKK participants” Article 21 "Membership terms" Article 22 “Acceptance to membership” Article 23 “Leaving membership” Article 24 "Temporary suspension or revocation of membership" Article 25 "Participant's responsibilities, operation principles and measures to be applied” Dematerialization Communiqué Article 6
Implementation measure cut-off date: 15-May-2022
Assessment rating date: 30-May-2019
Principle
An FMI should have objective, risk-based, and publicly disclosed criteria for participation, which permit fair and open access.
Implementation measures
CMB Policy Statement No.10/328 CML Article 13 "Dematerialisation of capital market instruments" CMB MKK Regulation Article 20 “MKK participants” Article 21 "Membership terms" Article 22 “Acceptance to membership” Article 23 “Leaving membership” Article 24 "Temporary suspension or revocation of membership" Article 25 "Participant's responsibilities, operation principles and measures to be applied" Dematerialization Communiqué Article 6
Implementation measure cut-off date: 15-May-2022
Assessment rating date: 30-May-2019
Principle
An FMI should have objective, risk-based, and publicly disclosed criteria for participation, which permit fair and open access.
Implementation measures
CMB Policy Statement No.10/328 CMB MKK Regulation Article 24 "Temporary suspension or revocation of membership" Article 25 "Participant's responsibilities, operation principles and measures to be applied" Article 33 "Disciplinary penalties"
Implementation measure cut-off date: 15-May-2022
Assessment rating date: 30-May-2019
Principle
An FMI should identify, monitor, and manage the material risks to the FMI arising from tiered participation arrangements.
Implementation measures
CMB Policy Statement No.10/328
Assessment comments (key conclusions and recommendations)
Although indirect participation is not defined in the regulation for CSDs, indirect participation is not forbidden under the applicable regulatory framework. It is recommended that the CMB addresses any gaps, including by having relevant rules to properly address the risks arising from tiered participation. This would complement the CMB Policy Statement that is applicable to CSDs, which requires “all FMIs operating in Turkish capital markets either currently or in the future […] to pay due care and diligence in complying with CPMI-IOSCO PFMI”.
This filter limits the search results to selected jurisdictions. The available jurisdictions represent assessments that have been completed to date. The table below provides also a pdf of key conclusions and recommendations for all Principles of a given jurisdiction.
| Jurisdiction and relevant authorities | Assessments and comments |
|---|---|
Australia RBA: Reserve Bank of Australia | |
Brazil BCB: Central Bank of Brazil | |
Canada | |
European Union ESMA: European Securities and Markets Authority | |
Hong Kong SAR HKMA: Hong Kong Monetary Authority | |
Japan | |
Singapore | |
Switzerland FINMA: Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority | |
Turkey CMB: Capital Markets Board of Türkiye | |
United Kingdom | |
United States CFTC: Commodity Futures Trading Commission |
This filter limits the search results to the selected FMI types. FMIs may be subject to different regulatory, supervisory and oversight regimes depending on their organisation, function and design.
PS: Payment system
A set of instruments, procedures and rules for the transfer of funds between or among participants; the system includes the participants and the entity operating the arrangement.
CSD/SSS: Central securities depository / Securities settlement system
CSDs are entities that provide securities accounts, central safekeeping services and asset services, which may include the administration of corporate actions and redemptions, and play an important role in helping to ensure the integrity of securities issues (that securities are not accidentally or fraudulently created or destroyed or their details changed). The precise activities of a CSD vary based on jurisdiction and market practices.
SSS are entities that enable securities to be transferred and settled by book entry according to a set of predetermined multilateral rules. Such systems allow transfers of securities either free of payment or against payment. Typically, a CSD also operates an SSS.
CCP: Central counterparty
An entity that interposes itself between counterparties to contracts traded in one or more financial markets, becoming the buyer to every seller and the seller to every buyer and thereby ensuring the performance of open contracts.
TR: Trade repository
An entity that maintains a centralised electronic record (database) of transaction data.
This filter limits the search results to selected principles and key considerations. Each principle includes a headline standard and a list of key considerations that further explain the headline standard. The principles are listed below. A detailed list of key considerations is available in the CPMI-IOSCO Principles for financial market infrastructures.
This filter limits the search results to selected principle rating(s) used in the L2 assessments. The ratings reflect conditions at the time of the assessment, and are built on key conclusions that reflect CPMI and IOSCO's collective expert judgment regarding the impact of identified gaps and/or shortcomings. Ratings are determined for each principle after the jurisdiction's legislative and regulatory framework, including policy statements, as relevant, was compared against the corresponding content of the PFMI.
The jurisdiction’s regulatory framework is consistent with the Principle. The assessment has identified no gaps or shortcomings, or only a few gaps and/or shortcomings that have no material impact on completeness and/or consistency.
The jurisdiction’s regulatory framework is broadly consistent with the Principle. The assessment has identified gaps and/or shortcomings that have a minor impact on completeness and/or consistency.
The jurisdiction’s regulatory framework is partly consistent with the Principle. The assessment has identified gaps and/or shortcomings that have a significant impact on completeness and/or consistency.
The jurisdiction’s regulatory framework is not consistent with the Principle. The assessment has identified gaps and/or shortcomings that have a major impact on completeness and/or consistency.
This status corresponds to the case where no relevant FMI exists that is within the scope of the Principles. A rating of “NA” will be indicated only if no relevant regulatory measures are being taken and no such FMI is expected to develop within the jurisdiction.