Skip to main content

Margin requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives

Type
Publication
Series
Consultative
Date Published
15 February 2013
Status
Closed
Sources
BCBS
Topics
Credit risk

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) have today published a second consultative paper which represents a near-final proposal on margin requirements for non-centrally-cleared derivatives.

Several features of the near-final proposal are intended to manage the liquidity impact of the margin requirements on financial market participants. The proposed requirements would allow for the introduction of a universal initial margin threshold of €50 million. The results of a quantitative impact study (QIS) conducted in 2012 indicate that application of the threshold could reduce the total liquidity costs by 56% relative to a margining framework with a zero initial margin threshold, which was initially proposed in the July 2012 first consultative paper.

Today's proposal also envisages a gradual phase-in to provide market participants with sufficient time to adjust to the requirements. The requirement to collect and post initial margin on non-centrally cleared trades is proposed to be phased in over a four year period beginning 2015 and begin with the largest, most active and most systemically risky derivative market participants.

The proposed margin standards are articulated through a set of key principles that primarily seek to ensure that appropriate margining practices will be established for all non-centrally-cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivative transactions. These principles will apply to all transactions that involve either financial firms or systemically important non-financial entities.

The Basel Committee and IOSCO seek public comment on the near-final proposal and specifically solicit feedback on the following four issues relating to:

  1. the treatment of physically-settled foreign exchange (FX) forwards and swaps under the framework,
  2. the ability to engage in limited re-hypothecation of collected initial margin,
  3. the proposed phase-in framework, and
  4. the adequacy of the conducted quantitative impact study (QIS).

Comments on these four issues which are discussed in greater detail in today's consultative paper should be submitted by Friday 15 March 2013 by e-mail to: baselcommittee@bis.org and/or wgmr@iosco.org. Alternatively, comments may be sent by post to the Secretariat of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Bank for International Settlements, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland; or to the Secretariat of IOSCO at Oquendo 12, 28006 Madrid, Spain. All comments may be published on the websites of the Bank for International Settlements and IOSCO unless a comment contributor specifically requests confidential treatment.

 


Comments received

The Committee wishes to thank those who have taken the time and effort to express their views on the above consultation. The comments received are available in PDF format below.

Alternative Investment Management Association
American Council of Life Insurers
AMUNDI
Association Francaise de la Gestion Financiere
Association of British Insurers
Association of Financial Guaranty Insurers
Association of Institutional Investors
Association of the Luxembourg Fund Industry
Australian Banks
Aviva Investors
Barclays
BBVA
Better Markets
BVI (German investment fund and asset management industry)
Canadian Bankers Association
Captive Finance Companies
Cardano Risk Management
Cargill
Chris Barnard
CLS Bank International
Commercial Energy Working Group
Commerzbank
Czech Banking Association
Danish Insurance Association
Deutsche Bank AG
Deutsches Aktieninstitut
Edward Barron
EFAMA
European Association of Corporate Treasurers and the US Coalition for Derivatives End-Users
European Association of Public Banks
European Banking Federation
European Covered Bond Council
European Federation of Energy Traders
European Investment Bank
Federation of Dutch Pension Funds
Financial Services Roundtable
FirstRand
French Banking Federation
General Insurance Association of Japan
German Banking Industry Committee
German Insurance Association
GFMA
Global Pension Coalition
HSBC
ICAP
IIF
ING
Insight Investment
Institute and Faculty of Actuaries
Instituto de Credito Oficial
Insurance Europe
Investment Company Institute and ICI Global
Investment Management Association
ISDA
Italian Banking Association
Japan Financial Markets Council
Japanese Bankers Association
KfW
Life Insurance Association of Japan
Luxembourg Bankers Association
Managed Funds Association
MetLife
Milko Osterndorf
NASDAQ OMX
National Association of Pension Funds
Natixis Asset Management
OSSIAM
PGGM
P-Solve
Riskcare
Royal Bank of Scotland
Saudi Banks
Shell
Siddhartha Roy
SIFMA Asset Management Group
SIFMA
Standard Chartered Bank
State Street
Towers Watson
UBS
Unicredit
Wholesale Markets Brokers Association

You might also be interested in