This chapter describes how to calculate capital requirements for securitisation exposures under the SECIRBA.
To calculate capital requirements for a securitisation exposure to an internal ratingsbased (IRB) pool, a bank must use the securitisation internal ratingsbased approach (SECIRBA) and the following banksupplied inputs: the IRB capital charge had the underlying exposures not been securitised (K_{IRB}), the tranche attachment point (A), the tranche detachment point (D) and the supervisory parameter p, as defined below. Where the only difference between exposures to a transaction is related to maturity, A and D will be the same.
K_{IRB} is the ratio of the following measures, expressed in decimal form (eg a capital charge equal to 15% of the pool would be expressed as 0.15):
Notwithstanding the clarification in CRE40.46 and CRE40.47 for mixed pools, CRE44.2(1) must be calculated in accordance with applicable minimum IRB standards in CRE30 to CRE36 as if the exposures in the pool were held directly by the bank. This calculation should reflect the effects of any credit risk mitigant that is applied on the underlying exposures (either individually or to the entire pool), and hence benefits all of the securitisation exposures.
For structures involving a special purpose entity (SPE), all of the SPE's exposures related to the securitisation are to be treated as exposures in the pool. Exposures related to the securitisation that should be treated as exposures in the pool could include assets in which the SPE may have invested a reserve account, such as a cash collateral account or claims against counterparties resulting from interest swaps or currency swaps.3 Notwithstanding, the bank can exclude the SPE's exposures from the pool for capital calculation purposes if the bank can demonstrate to its national supervisor that the risk of the SPE's exposures is immaterial (for example, because it has been mitigated4) or that it does not affect the bank's securitisation exposure.
In the case of funded synthetic securitisations, any proceeds of the issuances of creditlinked notes or other funded obligations of the SPE that serve as collateral for the repayment of the securitisation exposure in question and for which the bank cannot demonstrate to its national supervisor that it is immaterial must be included in the calculation of K_{IRB} if the default risk of the collateral is subject to the tranched loss allocation.5
To calculate K_{IRB}, the treatment for eligible purchased receivables described in CRE30.27 to CRE30.31, CRE34.2 to CRE34.7, CRE36.107, CRE36.109, CRE36.113 to CRE36.121 may be used, with the particularities specified in CRE44.7 to CRE44.9, if, according to IRB minimum requirements:
for nonretail assets, it would be an undue burden on a bank to assess the default risk of individual obligors; and
for retail assets, a bank is unable to primarily rely on internal data.
CRE44.6 applies to any securitised exposure, not just purchased receivables. For this purpose, "eligible purchased receivables" should be understood as referring to any securitised exposure for which the conditions of CRE44.6 are met, and "eligible purchased corporate receivables" should be understood as referring to any securitised nonretail exposure. All other IRB minimum requirements must be met by the bank.
Supervisors may deny the use of a topdown approach for eligible purchased receivables for securitised exposures depending on the bank's compliance with minimum requirements.
The requirements to use a topdown approach for the eligible purchased receivables are generally unchanged when applied to securitisations except in the following cases:
the requirement in CRE30.30 for the bank to have a claim on all proceeds from the pool of receivables or a prorata interest in the proceeds does not apply. Instead, the bank must have a claim on all proceeds from the pool of securitised exposures that have been allocated to the bank's exposure in the securitisation in accordance with the terms of the related securitisation documentation;
in CRE36.114, the purchasing bank should be interpreted as the bank calculating K_{IRB};
if the bank calculating K_{IRB} cannot itself meet the requirements in CRE36.116 to CRE36.120, it must instead ensure that it meets these requirements through a party to the securitisation acting for and in the interest of the investors in the securitisation, in accordance with the terms of the related securitisation documents. Specifically, requirements for effective control and ownership must be met for all proceeds from the pool of securitised exposures that have been allocated to the bank's exposure to the securitisation. Further, in CRE36.118(1), the relevant eligibility criteria and advancing policies are those of the securitisation, not those of the bank calculating K_{IRB}.
In cases where a bank has set aside a specific provision or has a nonrefundable purchase price discount on an exposure in the pool, the quantities defined in CRE44.2(1) and CRE44.2(2) must be calculated using the gross amount of the exposure without the specific provision and/or nonrefundable purchase price discount.
Where default and dilution risk are treated in an aggregate manner (eg an identical reserve or overcollateralisation is available to cover losses for both risks), in order to calculate capital requirements for the securitisation exposure, a bank must determine K_{IRB} for dilution risk and default risk, respectively, and combine them into a single K_{IRB} prior to applying the SECIRBA. CRE99.4 to CRE99.8 provides an illustration of such a calculation.
In certain circumstances, pool level credit enhancement will not be available to cover losses from either credit risk or dilution risk. In the case of separate waterfalls for credit risk and dilution risk, a bank should consult with its national supervisor as to how the capital calculation should be performed. To guide banks and supervisors, CRE99.9 to CRE99.19 includes an example of how such calculations could be made in a prudent manner.
The input A represents the threshold at which losses within the underlying pool would first be allocated to the securitisation exposure. This input, which is a decimal value between zero and one, equals the greater of
zero and
the ratio of
the outstanding balance of all underlying assets in the securitisation minus the outstanding balance of all tranches that rank senior or pari passu to the tranche that contains the securitisation exposure of the bank (including the exposure itself) to
the outstanding balance of all underlying assets in the securitisation.
The input D represents the threshold at which losses within the underlying pool result in a total loss of principal for the tranche in which a securitisation exposure resides. This input, which is a decimal value between zero and one, equals the greater of
zero and
the ratio of
the outstanding balance of all underlying assets in the securitisation minus the outstanding balance of all tranches that rank senior to the tranche that contains the securitisation exposure of the bank to
the outstanding balance of all underlying assets in the securitisation.
For the calculation of A and D, overcollateralisation and funded reserve accounts must be recognised as tranches; and the assets forming these reserve accounts must be recognised as underlying assets. Only the lossabsorbing part of the funded reserve accounts that provide credit enhancement can be recognised as tranches and underlying assets. Unfunded reserve accounts, such as those to be funded from future receipts from the underlying exposures (eg unrealised excess spread) and assets that do not provide credit enhancement like pure liquidity support, currency or interestrate swaps, or cash collateral accounts related to these instruments must not be included in the above calculation of A and D. Banks should take into consideration the economic substance of the transaction and apply these definitions conservatively in the light of the structure.
The supervisory parameter p in the context of the SECIRBA is expressed as follows, where:
0.3 denotes the pparameter floor;
N is the effective number of loans in the underlying pool, calculated as described in CRE44.20;
LGD is the exposureweighted average lossgivendefault of the underlying pool, calculated as described in CRE44.21);
the parameters A, B, C, D, and E are determined according to Table 1:
Lookup table for supervisory parameters A, B, C, D and E 
Table 1 

A 
B 
C 
D 
E 

Wholesale 
Senior, granular (N≥25) 
0 
3.56 
1.85 
0.55 
0.07 

Senior, nongranular (N<25) 
0.11 
2.61 
2.91 
0.68 
0.07 

Nonsenior, granular (N≥25) 
0.16 
2.87 
1.03 
0.21 
0.07 

Nonsenior, nongranular (N<25) 
0.22 
2.35 
2.46 
0.48 
0.07 

Retail 
Senior 
0 
0 
7.48 
0.71 
0.24 

Nonsenior 
0 
0 
5.78 
0.55 
0.27 

If the underlying IRB pool consists of both retail and wholesale exposures, the pool should be divided into one retail and one wholesale subpool and, for each subpool, a separate pparameter (and the corresponding input parameters N, K_{IRB} and LGD) should be estimated. Subsequently, a weighted average pparameter for the transaction should be calculated on the basis of the pparameters of each subpool and the nominal size of the exposures in each subpool.
The effective number of exposures, N, is calculated as follows, where EAD_{i} represents the exposureatdefault associated with the ith instrument in the pool. Multiple exposures to the same obligor must be consolidated (ie treated as a single instrument).
The exposureweighted average LGD is calculated as follows, where LGD_{i} represents the average LGD associated with all exposures to the ith obligor. When default and dilution risks for purchased receivables are treated in an aggregate manner (eg a single reserve or overcollateralisation is available to cover losses from either source) within a securitisation, the LGD input must be constructed as a weighted average of the LGD for default risk and the 100% LGD for dilution risk. The weights are the standalone IRB capital charges for default risk and dilution risk, respectively.
Under the conditions outlined below, banks may employ a simplified method for calculating the effective number of exposures and the exposureweighted average LGD. Let C_{m} in the simplified calculation denote the share of the pool corresponding to the sum of the largest m exposures (eg a 15% share corresponds to a value of 0.15). The level of m is set by each bank.
If the portfolio share associated with the largest exposure, C_{1}, is no more than 0.03 (or 3% of the underlying pool), then for purposes of the SECIRBA the bank may set LGD as 0.50 and N equal to the following amount:
Alternatively, if only C_{1 }is available and this amount is no more than 0.03, then the bank may set LGD as 0.50 and N as 1/C_{1}.
The formulation of the SECIRBA is expressed as follows, where:
is the capital requirement per unit of securitisation exposure under the SECIRBA, which is a function of three variables;
the constant e is the base of the natural logarithm (which equals 2.71828);
the variable a is defined as (1 / (p * K_{IRB}));
the variable u is defined as D  K_{IRB}; and
the variable l is defined as the maximum of A  K_{IRB} and zero.
The risk weight assigned to a securitisation exposure when applying the SECIRBA is calculated as follows:
When D for a securitisation exposure is less than or equal to K_{IRB}, the exposure must be assigned a risk weight of 1250%.
When A for a securitisation exposure is greater than or equal to K_{IRB}, the risk weight of the exposure, expressed as a percentage, would equal times 12.5.
When A is less than K_{IRB} and D is greater than K_{IRB}, the applicable risk weight is a weighted average of 1250% and 12.5 times according to the following formula:
The risk weight for market risk hedges such as currency or interest rate swaps will be inferred from a securitisation exposure that is pari passu to the swaps or, if such an exposure does not exist, from the next subordinated tranche.
Alternative capital treatment for term securitisations and shortterm securitisations meeting the STC criteria for capital purposes
Securitisation transactions that are assessed as simple, transparent and comparable (STC)compliant for capital purposes in CRE40.67 can be subject to capital requirements under the securitisation framework, taking into account that, when the SECIRBA is used, CRE44.28 and CRE44.29 are applicable instead of CRE44.17 and CRE44.26 respectively.
The supervisory parameter p in SECIRBA for an exposure to an STC securitisation is expressed as follows, where:
0.3 denotes the pparameter floor;
N is the effective number of loans in the underlying pool, calculated as described in CRE44.20;
LGD is the exposureweighted average lossgivendefault of the underlying pool, calculated as described in CRE44.21;
the parameters A, B, C, D, and E are determined according to Table 2:
Lookup table for supervisory parameters A, B, C, D and E 
Table 2 

A 
B 
C 
D 
E 

Wholesale 
Senior, granular (N≥25) 
0 
3.56 
1.85 
0.55 
0.07 

Senior, nongranular (N<25) 
0.11 
2.61 
2.91 
0.68 
0.07 

Nonsenior, granular (N≥25) 
0.16 
2.87 
1.03 
0.21 
0.07 

Nonsenior, nongranular (N<25) 
0.22 
2.35 
2.46 
0.48 
0.07 

Retail 
Senior 
0 
0 
7.48 
0.71 
0.24 

Nonsenior 
0 
0 
5.78 
0.55 
0.27 
