Fundamental review of the trading book - second consultative document
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has today issued a second consultative paper on the fundamental review of capital requirements for the trading book. The paper comprises a detailed set of proposals for a comprehensive revision of the market risk framework. This initiative forms part of the Committee's broader agenda to reform regulatory standards for banks in response to the financial crisis.
The May 2012 consultative paper set out a number of specific measures to improve trading book capital requirements. These initial proposals reflected the Committee's overall objective of designing a new regulatory framework that addresses weaknesses in risk measurement under the current internal models-based and standardised approaches, with a view to promoting consistent implementation across jurisdictions.
This second consultative document provides more detail on the approaches introduced in May 2012, and sets out a draft text for a revised market risk framework. It has been informed by comments received on the first consultative paper, and lessons learnt from the Committee's recent investigations into the variability of market risk-weighted assets.
The key features of the proposed revised framework include:
- A revised boundary between the trading book and banking book. The new approach aims to create a less permeable and more objective boundary that remains aligned with banks' risk management practices, and reduces the incentives for regulatory arbitrage.
- A revised risk measurement approach and calibration. The proposals involve a shift in the measure of risk from value-at-risk to expected shortfall so as to better capture "tail risk", and calibration based on a period of significant financial stress.
- The incorporation of the risk of market illiquidity, through the introduction of "liquidity horizons" in the market risk metric, and an additional risk assessment tool for trading desks with exposure to illiquid, complex products.
- A revised standardised approach that is sufficiently risk-sensitive to act as a credible fallback to internal models, and is still appropriate for banks that do not require sophisticated measurement of market risk.
- A revised internal models-based approach, encompassing a more rigorous model approval process, and more consistent identification and capitalisation of material risk factors. Hedging and diversification recognition will also be based on empirical evidence that such practices are effective during periods of stress.
- A strengthened relationship between the standardised and the models-based approaches. This is achieved by establishing a closer calibration of the two approaches, requiring mandatory calculation of the standardised approach by all banks, and requiring mandatory public disclosure of standardised capital charges by all banks, on a desk-by-desk basis.
- A closer alignment between the trading book and the banking book in the regulatory treatment of credit risk. This involves a differential approach to securitisation and non-securitisation exposures.
The Committee is also considering the merits of introducing the standardised approach as a floor or surcharge to the models-based approach. However, it will only make a final decision on this issue following a comprehensive Quantitative Impact Study, after assessing the impact and interactions of the revised standardised and models-based approaches.
Comments on this consultative document should be uploaded by Friday 31 January 2014. Alternatively, comments may be sent by post to the Secretariat of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Bank for International Settlements, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland. All comments will be published on the website of the Bank for International Settlements unless a respondent specifically requests confidential treatment.