<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:cb="http://www.cbwiki.net/wiki/index.php/Specification_1.1" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://www.bis.org/cbhub/list/series/sid_46/index.rss">
    <title>Central Bank Research Hub - Series: Boston Fed Working papers</title>
    <link>http://www.bis.org/cbhub/list/series/sid_46/index.rss</link>
    <description>Research hub papers by series: Boston Fed Working papers</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2012/wp1205.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2012/wp1216.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2012/wp1215.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/peek.htm" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2012/wp1210.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/presno.htm" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/sasser.htm" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/jamison.htm" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2011/wp1114.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/fuhrer.htm" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2011/wp1112.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2011/wp1109.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/ozdagli.htm" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/shy.htm" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/cooper.htm" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/diez.htm" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/barnes.htm" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1017.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1016.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1014.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1015.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1013.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1012.htm" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1011.pdf" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1010.htm" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2012/wp1205.pdf">
    <title>28Dec/Selecting Public Goods Institutions: Who Likes to Punish and Reward?</title>
    <link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2012/wp1205.pdf</link>
    <description>Boston Fed Working papers by Michalis Drouvelis and Julian C. Jamison</description>
    <dc:title>Selecting Public Goods Institutions: Who Likes to Punish and Reward?</dc:title>
    <dc:date>2012-12-28T17:38:59Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract>The authors extend the standard public goods game in a variety of ways, in particular by allowing for endogenous preference over institutions and by studying the relationship between individual types, their preferences, and later behavior within the various institutional environments. They collect individual data on a variety of demographic factors, in addition to measuring levels of risk aversion and ambiguity aversion (over both gains and losses). The authors then elicit preferences in an incentive-compatible manner over voluntary contribution mechanisms with and without reward and punishment options. Finally, they randomly assign subjects to one of the four institutions and observe repeated play. They find that payoffs are significantly greater when punishment is allowed but that only a small minority of participants prefers such an environment. There is at most a weak link between individual characteristics and elicited preferences over environments. On the other hand, institutional preferences, as well as individual characteristics, are more strongly predictive of behavior in the public goods game. For instance, loss averse individuals preemptively reward more often when that option is available. This result suggests that when studying social interactions, especially if people can choose whether to participate in a sanctions-and-rewards mechanism, it is important to consider individual attitudes toward risk and uncertainty.</dcterms:abstract>
    <cb:paper>
      <cb:simpleTitle>Selecting Public Goods Institutions: Who Likes to Punish and Reward?</cb:simpleTitle>
      <cb:occurrenceDate>2012-12-28T17:38:59Z</cb:occurrenceDate>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Abstract</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2012/wp1205.htm</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Full text</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2012/wp1205.pdf</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Michalis Drouvelis</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Julian C. Jamison</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:byline>Michalis Drouvelis and Julian C. Jamison</cb:byline>
      <cb:publicationDate>2000-12</cb:publicationDate>
      <cb:publication>Boston Fed Working papers</cb:publication>
    </cb:paper>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2012/wp1216.pdf">
    <title>28Dec/Predicting Health Behaviors with Economic Preferences and Perceived Control</title>
    <link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2012/wp1216.pdf</link>
    <description>Boston Fed Working papers by Lynn Conell-Price and Julian Jamison</description>
    <dc:title>Predicting Health Behaviors with Economic Preferences and Perceived Control</dc:title>
    <dc:date>2012-12-28T17:38:59Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract>We present new evidence on the relationship between health behaviors and experimental measures of risk and time preferences and introduce evidence that perceived control-a measure incorporated from the health psychology literature-is a stronger and more consistent predictor of health behaviors than economic preferences.</dcterms:abstract>
    <cb:paper>
      <cb:simpleTitle>Predicting Health Behaviors with Economic Preferences and Perceived Control</cb:simpleTitle>
      <cb:occurrenceDate>2012-12-28T17:38:59Z</cb:occurrenceDate>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Abstract</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2012/wp1216.htm</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Full text</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2012/wp1216.pdf</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Lynn Conell-Price</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Julian Jamison</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:byline>Lynn Conell-Price and Julian Jamison</cb:byline>
      <cb:publicationDate>2000-12</cb:publicationDate>
      <cb:publication>Boston Fed Working papers</cb:publication>
    </cb:paper>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2012/wp1215.pdf">
    <title>21Dec/Uncertainty Shocks in a Model of Effective Demand</title>
    <link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2012/wp1215.pdf</link>
    <description>Boston Fed Working papers by Susanto Basu and Brent Bundick</description>
    <dc:title>Uncertainty Shocks in a Model of Effective Demand</dc:title>
    <dc:date>2012-12-21T06:23:00Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract>This paper examines the role of uncertainty shocks in a one-sector, representative-agent dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model. When prices are flexible, uncertainty shocks are not capable of producing business cycle comovements among key macro variables. With countercyclical markups through sticky prices, however, uncertainty shocks can generate fluctuations that are consistent with business cycles. Monetary policy usually plays a key role in offsetting the negative impact of uncertainty shocks. If the central bank is constrained by the zero lower bound, then monetary policy can no longer perform its usual stabilizing function and higher uncertainty has even more negative effects on the economy. Calibrating the size of uncertainty shocks using fluctuations in the VIX, the authors find that increased uncertainty about the future may indeed have played a significant role in worsening the Great Recession, which is consistent with statements by policymakers, economists, and the financial press.</dcterms:abstract>
    <cb:paper>
      <cb:simpleTitle>Uncertainty Shocks in a Model of Effective Demand</cb:simpleTitle>
      <cb:occurrenceDate>2012-12-21T06:23:00Z</cb:occurrenceDate>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Abstract</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2012/wp1215.htm</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Full text</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2012/wp1215.pdf</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Brent Bundick</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Susanto Basu</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:byline>Susanto Basu and Brent Bundick</cb:byline>
      <cb:publicationDate>2000-12</cb:publicationDate>
      <cb:publication>Boston Fed Working papers</cb:publication>
    </cb:paper>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/peek.htm">
    <title>10Nov/Nice to be on the A-List</title>
    <link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/peek.htm</link>
    <description>Boston Fed Working papers by Yasushi Hamao, Kenji Kutsuna, and Joe Peek</description>
    <dc:title>Nice to be on the A-List</dc:title>
    <dc:date>2012-11-10T06:23:59Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract>Research &amp;amp; Data</dcterms:abstract>
    <cb:paper>
      <cb:simpleTitle>Nice to be on the A-List</cb:simpleTitle>
      <cb:occurrenceDate>2012-11-10T06:23:59Z</cb:occurrenceDate>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Abstract</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/peek.htm</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Joe Peek</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Kenji Kutsuna</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Yasushi Hamao</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:byline>Yasushi Hamao, Kenji Kutsuna, and Joe Peek</cb:byline>
      <cb:publicationDate>2000-11</cb:publicationDate>
      <cb:publication>Boston Fed Working papers</cb:publication>
    </cb:paper>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2012/wp1210.pdf">
    <title>19Oct/Fiscal Devaluations</title>
    <link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2012/wp1210.pdf</link>
    <description>Boston Fed Working papers by Emmanuel Farhi, Gita Gopinath, and Oleg Itskhoki</description>
    <dc:title>Fiscal Devaluations</dc:title>
    <dc:date>2012-10-19T06:39:59Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract>The authors show that even when the exchange rate cannot be devalued, a small set of conventional fiscal policy instruments can robustly replicate the real allocations attained under a nominal exchange rate devaluation in a standard New Keynesian open economy environment. They perform the analysis under alternative pricing assumptions-producer or local currency pricing along with nominal wage stickiness, under alternative asset market structures, and for anticipated and unanticipated devaluations. There are two types of fiscal policies equivalent to an exchange rate devaluation: one, a uniform increase in the import tariff and export subsidy, and two, an increase in the value-added tax and a uniform reduction in the payroll tax. When the devaluations are anticipated, these policies need to be supplemented with a reduction in the consumption tax and an increase in income taxes. These policies have zero impact on fiscal revenues. In certain cases equivalence requires in addition a partial default on foreign bondholders. They discuss the issues regarding implementation of these policies, in particular in the case of a currency union.</dcterms:abstract>
    <cb:paper>
      <cb:simpleTitle>Fiscal Devaluations</cb:simpleTitle>
      <cb:occurrenceDate>2012-10-19T06:39:59Z</cb:occurrenceDate>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Abstract</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2012/wp1210.htm</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Full text</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2012/wp1210.pdf</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Emmanuel Farhi</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Oleg Itskhoki</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Gita Gopinath</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:byline>Emmanuel Farhi, Gita Gopinath, and Oleg Itskhoki</cb:byline>
      <cb:publicationDate>2000-10</cb:publicationDate>
      <cb:publication>Boston Fed Working papers</cb:publication>
    </cb:paper>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/presno.htm">
    <title>19Oct/Sovereign Default Risk and Uncertainty Premia</title>
    <link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/presno.htm</link>
    <description>Boston Fed Working papers by Demian Pouzo and Ignacio Presno</description>
    <dc:title>Sovereign Default Risk and Uncertainty Premia</dc:title>
    <dc:date>2012-10-19T06:39:59Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract>Research &amp;amp; Data</dcterms:abstract>
    <cb:paper>
      <cb:simpleTitle>Sovereign Default Risk and Uncertainty Premia</cb:simpleTitle>
      <cb:occurrenceDate>2012-10-19T06:39:59Z</cb:occurrenceDate>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Abstract</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/presno.htm</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Demian Pouzo</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Ignacio Presno</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:byline>Demian Pouzo and Ignacio Presno</cb:byline>
      <cb:publicationDate>2000-10</cb:publicationDate>
      <cb:publication>Boston Fed Working papers</cb:publication>
    </cb:paper>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/sasser.htm">
    <title>08Feb/Are American Homeowners Locked into Their Houses? The Impact of Housing Market Conditions on State-to-State Migration</title>
    <link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/sasser.htm</link>
    <description>Boston Fed Working papers by Alicia Sasser Modestino and Julia Dennett</description>
    <dc:title>Are American Homeowners Locked into Their Houses? The Impact of Housing Market Conditions on State-to-State Migration</dc:title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-08T17:38:59Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract>Research &amp;amp; Data</dcterms:abstract>
    <cb:paper>
      <cb:simpleTitle>Are American Homeowners Locked into Their Houses? The Impact of Housing Market Conditions on State-to-State Migration</cb:simpleTitle>
      <cb:occurrenceDate>2012-02-08T17:38:59Z</cb:occurrenceDate>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Abstract</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/sasser.htm</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Alicia Sasser Modestino</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Julia Dennett</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:byline>Alicia Sasser Modestino and Julia Dennett</cb:byline>
      <cb:publicationDate>2000-02</cb:publicationDate>
      <cb:publication>Boston Fed Working papers</cb:publication>
    </cb:paper>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/jamison.htm">
    <title>08Dec/Games with Synergistic Preferences</title>
    <link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/jamison.htm</link>
    <description>Boston Fed Working papers by Julian C. Jamison</description>
    <dc:title>Games with Synergistic Preferences</dc:title>
    <dc:date>2011-12-08T10:39:59Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract>Research &amp;amp; Data</dcterms:abstract>
    <cb:paper>
      <cb:simpleTitle>Games with Synergistic Preferences</cb:simpleTitle>
      <cb:occurrenceDate>2011-12-08T10:39:59Z</cb:occurrenceDate>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Abstract</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/jamison.htm</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Julian C. Jamison</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:byline>Julian C. Jamison</cb:byline>
      <cb:publicationDate>2000-12</cb:publicationDate>
      <cb:publication>Boston Fed Working papers</cb:publication>
    </cb:paper>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2011/wp1114.pdf">
    <title>08Dec/Managing Self-Confidence: Theory and Experimental Evidence</title>
    <link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2011/wp1114.pdf</link>
    <description>Boston Fed Working papers by Markus M. Möbius, Muriel Niederle, Paul Niehaus, and Tanya S. Rosenblat</description>
    <dc:title>Managing Self-Confidence: Theory and Experimental Evidence</dc:title>
    <dc:date>2011-12-08T10:39:59Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract>Evidence from social psychology suggests that agents process information about their own ability in a biased manner. This evidence has motivated exciting research in behavioral economics, but also garnered critics who point out that it is potentially consistent with standard Bayesian updating. We implement a direct experimental test. We study a large sample of 656 undergraduate students, tracking the evolution of their beliefs about their own relative performance on an IQ test as they receive noisy feedback from a known data-generating process. Our design lets us repeatedly measure the complete relevant belief distribution incentive-compatibly. We find that subjects (1) place approximately full weight on their priors, but (2) are asymmetric, over-weighting positive feedback relative to negative, and (3) conservative, updating too little in response to both positive and negative signals. These biases are substantially less pronounced in a placebo experiment where ego is not at stake. We also find that (4) a substantial portion of subjects are averse to receiving information about their ability, and that (5) less confident subjects are more likely to be averse. We unify these phenomena by showing that they all arise naturally in a simple model of optimally biased Bayesian information processing.</dcterms:abstract>
    <cb:paper>
      <cb:simpleTitle>Managing Self-Confidence: Theory and Experimental Evidence</cb:simpleTitle>
      <cb:occurrenceDate>2011-12-08T10:39:59Z</cb:occurrenceDate>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Abstract</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2011/wp1114.htm</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Full text</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2011/wp1114.pdf</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Markus M. Möbius</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Muriel Niederle</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Tanya S. Rosenblat</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Paul Niehaus</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:byline>Markus M. Möbius, Muriel Niederle, Paul Niehaus, and Tanya S. Rosenblat</cb:byline>
      <cb:publicationDate>2000-12</cb:publicationDate>
      <cb:publication>Boston Fed Working papers</cb:publication>
    </cb:paper>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/fuhrer.htm">
    <title>08Dec/The Role of Expectations in U.S. Inflation Dynamics</title>
    <link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/fuhrer.htm</link>
    <description>Boston Fed Working papers by Jeffrey C. Fuhrer</description>
    <dc:title>The Role of Expectations in U.S. Inflation Dynamics</dc:title>
    <dc:date>2011-12-08T10:39:59Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract>Research &amp;amp; Data</dcterms:abstract>
    <cb:paper>
      <cb:simpleTitle>The Role of Expectations in U.S. Inflation Dynamics</cb:simpleTitle>
      <cb:occurrenceDate>2011-12-08T10:39:59Z</cb:occurrenceDate>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Abstract</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/fuhrer.htm</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Jeffrey C. Fuhrer</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:byline>Jeffrey C. Fuhrer</cb:byline>
      <cb:publicationDate>2000-12</cb:publicationDate>
      <cb:publication>Boston Fed Working papers</cb:publication>
    </cb:paper>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2011/wp1112.pdf">
    <title>08Dec/Further Investigations into the Origin of Credit Score Cutoff Rules</title>
    <link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2011/wp1112.pdf</link>
    <description>Boston Fed Working papers by Ryan Bubb and Alex Kaufman</description>
    <dc:title>Further Investigations into the Origin of Credit Score Cutoff Rules</dc:title>
    <dc:date>2011-12-08T10:39:59Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract>Keys, Mukherjee, and Vig (2010a) argue that the evidence presented in Bubb and Kaufman (2009) is based on an inappropriate pooling of loans sold to private-label securitizers with loans sold to the government sponsored enterprises (GSEs). In this paper we investigate the issues raised by the authors and conclude that they do not change our basic analytical approach or conclusions. We examine samples that do not pool together loans sold to these two types of purchasers-a sample of loans bought by the GSEs, a sample of loans originated in 2008-2009 after the private-label market collapsed, and a sample of jumbo loans-and find discontinuities in the number and default rate of loans at credit score cutoffs in the absence of corresponding discontinuities in the securitization rate. We also examine a key assumption underlying their estimates-that no loans are both at risk of being sold to the GSEs and at risk of being sold to private-label securitizers-and show that the data are inconsistent with that assumption. We find that 18 percent of conforming loans in our sample at some time switched between GSE and private-label ownership, demonstrating that the GSEs and private-label securitizers competed for the same loans. Additionally, we show that lender screening cutoffs grew steadily over the period 1997-2010 during which the private-label market rose and collapsed.</dcterms:abstract>
    <cb:paper>
      <cb:simpleTitle>Further Investigations into the Origin of Credit Score Cutoff Rules</cb:simpleTitle>
      <cb:occurrenceDate>2011-12-08T10:39:59Z</cb:occurrenceDate>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Abstract</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2011/wp1112.htm</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Full text</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2011/wp1112.pdf</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Alex Kaufman</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Ryan Bubb</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:byline>Ryan Bubb and Alex Kaufman</cb:byline>
      <cb:publicationDate>2000-12</cb:publicationDate>
      <cb:publication>Boston Fed Working papers</cb:publication>
    </cb:paper>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2011/wp1109.pdf">
    <title>14Sep/Trade Adjustment and Productivity in Large Crises</title>
    <link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2011/wp1109.pdf</link>
    <description>Boston Fed Working papers by Gita Gopinath and Brent Neiman</description>
    <dc:title>Trade Adjustment and Productivity in Large Crises</dc:title>
    <dc:date>2011-09-14T06:23:00Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract>The authors empirically characterize the mechanics of trade adjustment during the Argentine crisis using detailed firm-level customs data covering the universe of import transactions made during 1996â€&amp;quot;2008. Their main findings are as follows: First, the extensive margin defined as the entry and exit of firms or of products (at the country level) plays a small role during the crisis. Second, the sub-extensive margin defined as the churning of inputs within firms plays a sizeable role in aggregate adjustment. This implies that the true increase in input costs exceeds that imputed from conventional price indices. Third, the relative importance of these margins and of overall trade adjustment varies with firm size. Motivated by these facts, we build a model of trade in intermediate inputs with heterogeneous firms, fixed import costs, and round-about production to evaluate the channels through which a collapse in imports affects TFP (total factor productivity) in manufacturing. Measured aggregate productivity in the sector depends on within-firm adjustments to the varieties imported as well as the joint distribution of each firm&amp;#39;s technology and the share of imports in its total spending on inputs. We simulate an imported input cost shock and show that these mechanisms can deliver quantitatively significant declines in manufacturing TFP.</dcterms:abstract>
    <cb:paper>
      <cb:simpleTitle>Trade Adjustment and Productivity in Large Crises</cb:simpleTitle>
      <cb:occurrenceDate>2011-09-14T06:23:00Z</cb:occurrenceDate>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Abstract</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2011/wp1109.htm</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Full text</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2011/wp1109.pdf</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Brent Neiman</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Gita Gopinath</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:byline>Gita Gopinath and Brent Neiman</cb:byline>
      <cb:publicationDate>2000-09</cb:publicationDate>
      <cb:publication>Boston Fed Working papers</cb:publication>
    </cb:paper>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/ozdagli.htm">
    <title>26Jul/On the Distribution of College Dropouts: Household Wealth and Uninsurable Idiosyncratic Risk</title>
    <link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/ozdagli.htm</link>
    <description>Boston Fed Working papers by Ali K. Ozdagli and Nicholas Trachter</description>
    <dc:title>On the Distribution of College Dropouts: Household Wealth and Uninsurable Idiosyncratic Risk</dc:title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-26T06:23:00Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract>Research &amp;amp; Data</dcterms:abstract>
    <cb:paper>
      <cb:simpleTitle>On the Distribution of College Dropouts: Household Wealth and Uninsurable Idiosyncratic Risk</cb:simpleTitle>
      <cb:occurrenceDate>2011-07-26T06:23:00Z</cb:occurrenceDate>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Abstract</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/ozdagli.htm</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Ali K. Ozdagli</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Nicholas Trachter</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:byline>Ali K. Ozdagli and Nicholas Trachter</cb:byline>
      <cb:publicationDate>2000-07</cb:publicationDate>
      <cb:publication>Boston Fed Working papers</cb:publication>
    </cb:paper>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/shy.htm">
    <title>16Jul/Customer Recognition and Competition</title>
    <link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/shy.htm</link>
    <description>Boston Fed Working papers by Oz Shy and Rune Stenbacka</description>
    <dc:title>Customer Recognition and Competition</dc:title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-16T06:23:59Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract>Research &amp;amp; Data</dcterms:abstract>
    <cb:paper>
      <cb:simpleTitle>Customer Recognition and Competition</cb:simpleTitle>
      <cb:occurrenceDate>2011-07-16T06:23:59Z</cb:occurrenceDate>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Abstract</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/shy.htm</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Oz Shy</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Rune Stenbacka</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:byline>Oz Shy and Rune Stenbacka</cb:byline>
      <cb:publicationDate>2000-07</cb:publicationDate>
      <cb:publication>Boston Fed Working papers</cb:publication>
    </cb:paper>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/cooper.htm">
    <title>09Jul/House Price Growth When Kids are Teenagers: A Path to Higher Intergenerational Achievement?</title>
    <link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/cooper.htm</link>
    <description>Boston Fed Working papers by Daniel Cooper and María José Luengo-Prado</description>
    <dc:title>House Price Growth When Kids are Teenagers: A Path to Higher Intergenerational Achievement?</dc:title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-09T06:23:00Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract>Research &amp;amp; Data</dcterms:abstract>
    <cb:paper>
      <cb:simpleTitle>House Price Growth When Kids are Teenagers: A Path to Higher Intergenerational Achievement?</cb:simpleTitle>
      <cb:occurrenceDate>2011-07-09T06:23:00Z</cb:occurrenceDate>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Abstract</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/cooper.htm</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Daniel Cooper</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>María José Luengo-Prado</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:byline>Daniel Cooper and María José Luengo-Prado</cb:byline>
      <cb:publicationDate>2011-07</cb:publicationDate>
      <cb:publication>Boston Fed Working papers</cb:publication>
    </cb:paper>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/diez.htm">
    <title>01Jul/Self-Employment in the Global Economy</title>
    <link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/diez.htm</link>
    <description>Boston Fed Working papers by Federico J. Díez and Ali K. Ozdagli</description>
    <dc:title>Self-Employment in the Global Economy</dc:title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-01T06:23:59Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract>Research &amp;amp; Data</dcterms:abstract>
    <cb:paper>
      <cb:simpleTitle>Self-Employment in the Global Economy</cb:simpleTitle>
      <cb:occurrenceDate>2011-07-01T06:23:59Z</cb:occurrenceDate>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Abstract</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/diez.htm</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Ali K. Ozdagli</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Federico J. Díez</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:byline>Federico J. Díez and Ali K. Ozdagli</cb:byline>
      <cb:publicationDate>2011-07</cb:publicationDate>
      <cb:publication>Boston Fed Working papers</cb:publication>
    </cb:paper>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/barnes.htm">
    <title>17Jun/Estimation of Forward-Looking Relationships in Closed Form: An Application to the New Keynesian Phillips Curve</title>
    <link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/barnes.htm</link>
    <description>Boston Fed Working papers by Michelle L. Barnes, Fabià Gumbau-Brisa, Denny Lie, and Giovanni P. Olivei</description>
    <dc:title>Estimation of Forward-Looking Relationships in Closed Form: An Application to the New Keynesian Phillips Curve</dc:title>
    <dc:date>2011-06-17T17:40:00Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract>Research &amp;amp; Data</dcterms:abstract>
    <cb:paper>
      <cb:simpleTitle>Estimation of Forward-Looking Relationships in Closed Form: An Application to the New Keynesian Phillips Curve</cb:simpleTitle>
      <cb:occurrenceDate>2011-06-17T17:40:00Z</cb:occurrenceDate>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Abstract</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/econbios/barnes.htm</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Fabià Gumbau-Brisa</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Michelle L. Barnes</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Denny Lie</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Giovanni Olivei</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:byline>Michelle L. Barnes, Fabià Gumbau-Brisa, Denny Lie, and Giovanni P. Olivei</cb:byline>
      <cb:publicationDate>2011-06</cb:publicationDate>
      <cb:publication>Boston Fed Working papers</cb:publication>
    </cb:paper>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1017.pdf">
    <title>31Dec/The Financial Structure of Startup Firms: The Role of Assets, Information, and Entrepreneur Characteristics</title>
    <link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1017.pdf</link>
    <description>Boston Fed Working papers by Paroma Sanyal and Catherine L. Mann</description>
    <dc:title>The Financial Structure of Startup Firms: The Role of Assets, Information, and Entrepreneur Characteristics</dc:title>
    <dc:date>2010-12-31T06:23:59Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract>Using the Kauffman Firm Survey, we examine how characteristics of a startup&amp;#39;s assets, information about the startup, and entrepreneur attributes relate to financial structure at inception. Startups with more physical assets or those where the entrepreneurs have other similar businesses are more likely to use external debt in the financial structure since these assets have a high liquidation value. Startups with human capital embodied in the entrepreneur or intellectual property assets have a lower probability of using debt, consistent with the higher asset specificity and lower collateral value of these assets. Startups characterized as small, unincorporated, solo, first-time, or home-office-based are more likely to be financed by self, family and friends, and importantly through credit cards, as these have both highly specific assets and information opacity. More educated founders and non-African American founders are more likely to be financed by external sources. Controlling for other attributes of the startup, the financial structure of women-owned startups does not differ from that of other startups. Hi-tech startups&amp;#39; financial structure differs significantly from that of startups in other business sectors.</dcterms:abstract>
    <cb:paper>
      <cb:simpleTitle>The Financial Structure of Startup Firms: The Role of Assets, Information, and Entrepreneur Characteristics</cb:simpleTitle>
      <cb:occurrenceDate>2010-12-31T06:23:59Z</cb:occurrenceDate>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Abstract</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1017.htm</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Full text</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1017.pdf</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Catherine L. Mann</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Paroma Sanyal</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:byline>Paroma Sanyal and Catherine L. Mann</cb:byline>
      <cb:publicationDate>2010-12</cb:publicationDate>
      <cb:publication>Boston Fed Working papers</cb:publication>
    </cb:paper>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1016.pdf">
    <title>24Dec/Affective Decision Making: A Theory of Optimism Bias</title>
    <link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1016.pdf</link>
    <description>Boston Fed Working papers by Anat Bracha and Donald J. Brown</description>
    <dc:title>Affective Decision Making: A Theory of Optimism Bias</dc:title>
    <dc:date>2010-12-24T06:23:59Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract>Optimism bias is inconsistent with the independence of decision weights and payoffs found in models of choice under risk, such as expected utility theory and prospect theory. Hence, to explain the evidence suggesting that agents are optimistically biased, we propose an alternative model of risky choice, affective decision making, where decision weights—which we label affective or perceived risk—are endogenized.</dcterms:abstract>
    <cb:paper>
      <cb:simpleTitle>Affective Decision Making: A Theory of Optimism Bias</cb:simpleTitle>
      <cb:occurrenceDate>2010-12-24T06:23:59Z</cb:occurrenceDate>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Abstract</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1016.htm</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Full text</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1016.pdf</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Donald J. Brown</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Anat Bracha</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:byline>Anat Bracha and Donald J. Brown</cb:byline>
      <cb:publicationDate>2010-12</cb:publicationDate>
      <cb:publication>Boston Fed Working papers</cb:publication>
    </cb:paper>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1014.pdf">
    <title>21Dec/Characterizing the Amount and Speed of Discounting Procedures</title>
    <link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1014.pdf</link>
    <description>Boston Fed Working papers by Dean T. Jamison and Julian C. Jamison</description>
    <dc:title>Characterizing the Amount and Speed of Discounting Procedures</dc:title>
    <dc:date>2010-12-21T06:23:59Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract>This paper introduces the concept of categorizing the amount and speed of a discounting procedure in order to generate well-characterized families of procedures for use in social project evaluation. Exponential discounting isolates the concepts of amount and speed into a single parameter that must be disaggregated in order to characterize nonconstant rate procedures. The inverse of the present value of a unit stream of benefits provides a natural measure of the amount a procedure discounts the future. We propose geometrical- and time horizon-based measures of how rapidly a procedure acquires its ultimate present value, and we prove these values are the same. This equivalency provides an unambiguous measure of the speed of discounting, with values between 0 (slow) and 2 (fast). Exponential discounting has a speed of 1. A commonly proposed approach to aggregating individual discounting procedures into a social one for project evaluation averages the individual functions. We point to a serious shortcoming with this approach and propose an alternative for which the amount and time horizon of the social procedure are the average values of the amounts and time horizons of the individual procedures. We further show that this social procedure will in general be slower than the average of the individual procedures&amp;#39; speeds. We then characterize three families of two-parameter discounting procedures—hyperbolic, gamma, and Weibull—in terms of their discount functions, discount rate functions, amounts, speeds, and time horizons. (The appendix characterizes additional families, including the quasi-hyperbolic procedure.) A one-parameter version of hyperbolic discounting, d(t)=(1+rt)-2, has amount r and speed 0. We argue that this zero-speed hyperbolic procedure is a good candidate for use in social project evaluation, although additional empirical work is needed to fully justify a one-parameter simplification of the more general procedure.</dcterms:abstract>
    <cb:paper>
      <cb:simpleTitle>Characterizing the Amount and Speed of Discounting Procedures</cb:simpleTitle>
      <cb:occurrenceDate>2010-12-21T06:23:59Z</cb:occurrenceDate>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Abstract</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1014.htm</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Full text</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1014.pdf</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Dean T. Jamison</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Julian C. Jamison</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:byline>Dean T. Jamison and Julian C. Jamison</cb:byline>
      <cb:publicationDate>2010-12</cb:publicationDate>
      <cb:publication>Boston Fed Working papers</cb:publication>
    </cb:paper>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1015.pdf">
    <title>21Dec/Internal Sources of Finance and the Great Recession</title>
    <link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1015.pdf</link>
    <description>Boston Fed Working papers by Michelle L. Barnes and N. Aaron Pancost</description>
    <dc:title>Internal Sources of Finance and the Great Recession</dc:title>
    <dc:date>2010-12-21T06:23:59Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract>The rising stockpile of cash as a share of total assets at U.S. firms has intrigued economists since at least the paper of Bates, Kahle, and Stulz (2006), yet there has been relatively little work on where this cash has come from and how it is related to investment performance. We exploit Statement of Cash Flows data from Compustat to decompose firms&amp;#39; cash stocks and show that the rise in cash holdings has coincided with an increased willingness to save internally generated cash. We show that although investment is normally sensitive to externally generated cash, the increased sensitivity of investment to cash during the Great Recession is driven by cash from internal sources. Smaller firms were also more affected by the recent downturn than larger firms. Our results agree with the findings of Almeida, Campello, and Weisbach (2004) on cash hoarding and financial constraints, as well as the estimates in Duchin, Ozbas, and Sensoy (2010) on the important role of saved cash during the financial crisis.</dcterms:abstract>
    <cb:paper>
      <cb:simpleTitle>Internal Sources of Finance and the Great Recession</cb:simpleTitle>
      <cb:occurrenceDate>2010-12-21T06:23:59Z</cb:occurrenceDate>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Abstract</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1015.htm</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Full text</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1015.pdf</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>N. Aaron Pancost</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Michelle L. Barnes</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:byline>Michelle L. Barnes and N. Aaron Pancost</cb:byline>
      <cb:publicationDate>2010-12</cb:publicationDate>
      <cb:publication>Boston Fed Working papers</cb:publication>
    </cb:paper>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1013.pdf">
    <title>21Dec/The Distress Premium Puzzle</title>
    <link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1013.pdf</link>
    <description>Boston Fed Working papers by Ali K. Ozdagli</description>
    <dc:title>The Distress Premium Puzzle</dc:title>
    <dc:date>2010-12-21T06:23:59Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract>Fama and French (1992) suggest that the positive value premium results from risk of financial distress. However, recent empirical research has found that financially distressed firms have lower stock returns, using empirical estimates of default probabilities. This paper reconciles the positive value premium and the negative distress premium in a model that decouples actual and risk-neutral default probabilities. Moreover, in agreement with the data, firms with higher bond yields have higher stock returns in the model. The model also captures the fact that book-to-market value dominates financial leverage in explaining stock returns. Finally, the model predicts that firms with higher risk-neutral default probabilities should have higher stock returns, a hypothesis that can be tested using credit default swap premiums.</dcterms:abstract>
    <cb:paper>
      <cb:simpleTitle>The Distress Premium Puzzle</cb:simpleTitle>
      <cb:occurrenceDate>2010-12-21T06:23:59Z</cb:occurrenceDate>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Abstract</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1013.htm</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Full text</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1013.pdf</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Ali K. Ozdagli</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:byline>Ali K. Ozdagli</cb:byline>
      <cb:publicationDate>2010-12</cb:publicationDate>
      <cb:publication>Boston Fed Working papers</cb:publication>
    </cb:paper>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1012.htm">
    <title>09Dec/Inputing Household Spending in the Panel Study of Income Dynamics: A Comparison of Approaches</title>
    <link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1012.htm</link>
    <description>Boston Fed Working papers by Daniel Cooper</description>
    <dc:title>Inputing Household Spending in the Panel Study of Income Dynamics: A Comparison of Approaches</dc:title>
    <dc:date>2010-12-09T17:38:00Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract>One of the drawbacks of using household surveys to investigate macroeconomic issues has been a lack of a dataset that contains both adequate household expenditure data and comprehensive household wealth and income data. This paper compares alternative methods of imputing household expenditures in the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID)—that of Blundell et al. (2006) and Cooper ( 2009). It also analyzes the additional expenditure questions included in the PSID starting in 1999 and expanded in 2005. The paper finds that the Blundell et al. (2006) method works well for imputing households&amp;#39; nondurable expenditures between 1980 and 2007. The results further show that the imputation method in Cooper (2009) dominates that of Blundell et al. (2006) for generating data on households’ total expenditures. The decision of which imputation approach to use or whether to use the actual PSID expenditure data from 1999 to 2007 will depend on the user’s research question(s) and analysis goals.</dcterms:abstract>
    <cb:paper>
      <cb:simpleTitle>Inputing Household Spending in the Panel Study of Income Dynamics: A Comparison of Approaches</cb:simpleTitle>
      <cb:occurrenceDate>2010-12-09T17:38:00Z</cb:occurrenceDate>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Abstract</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1012.htm</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Daniel Cooper</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:byline>Daniel Cooper</cb:byline>
      <cb:publicationDate>2010-12</cb:publicationDate>
      <cb:publication>Boston Fed Working papers</cb:publication>
    </cb:paper>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1011.pdf">
    <title>03Dec/Some Evidence on the Importance of Sticky Wages</title>
    <link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1011.pdf</link>
    <description>Boston Fed Working papers by Alessandro Barattieri, Susanto Basu, and Peter Gottschalk</description>
    <dc:title>Some Evidence on the Importance of Sticky Wages</dc:title>
    <dc:date>2010-12-03T17:40:00Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract>Nominal wage stickiness is an important component of recent medium-scale macroeconomic models, but to date there has been little microeconomic evidence supporting the assumption of sluggish nominal wage adjustment. We present evidence on the frequency of nominal wage adjustment using data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) for the period 1996–1999. The SIPP provides high-frequency information on wages, employment, and demographic characteristics for a large and representative sample of the U.S. population. The main results of the analysis are as follows: (1) After correcting for measurement error, wages appear to be very sticky. In the average quarter, the probability that an individual will experience a nominal wage change is between 5 and 18 percent, depending on the samples and assumptions used. (2) The frequency of wage adjustment does not display significant seasonal patterns. (3) There is little heterogeneity in the frequency of wage adjustment across industries and occupations. (4) The hazard of a nominal wage change first increases and then decreases, with a peak at 12 months. (5) The probability of a wage change is positively correlated with the unemployment rate and with the consumer price inflation rate.</dcterms:abstract>
    <cb:paper>
      <cb:simpleTitle>Some Evidence on the Importance of Sticky Wages</cb:simpleTitle>
      <cb:occurrenceDate>2010-12-03T17:40:00Z</cb:occurrenceDate>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Abstract</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1011.htm</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Full text</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1011.pdf</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Peter Gottschalk</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Alessandro Barattieri</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Susanto Basu</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:byline>Alessandro Barattieri, Susanto Basu, and Peter Gottschalk</cb:byline>
      <cb:publicationDate>2010-12</cb:publicationDate>
      <cb:publication>Boston Fed Working papers</cb:publication>
    </cb:paper>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1010.htm">
    <title>29Sep/Strategic Choice of Preferences: The Persona Model</title>
    <link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1010.htm</link>
    <description>Boston Fed Working papers by David H. Wolpert, Julian Jamison, David Newth, and Michael Harre</description>
    <dc:title>Strategic Choice of Preferences: The Persona Model</dc:title>
    <dc:date>2010-09-29T09:25:59Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract>We introduce a modification to the two-timescale games studied in the evolution of preferences (EOP) literature. In this modification, the strategic process occurring on the long timescale is learning by an individual across his or her lifetime, not natural selection operating on genomes over multiple generations. This change to the longer timescale removes many of the formal difficulties of EOP models and allows us to show how two-timescale games can provide endogenous explanations for why humans sometimes adopt interdependent preferences and sometimes exhibit logit quantal response functions. In particular, we show that our modification to EOP explains experimental data in the Traveler’s Dilemma. We also use our modification to show how cooperation can arise in nonrepeated versions of the Prisoner’s Dilemma (PD). We then show that our modification to EOP predicts a “crowding out&amp;quot; phenomenon in the PD, in which introducing incentives to cooperate causes players to stop cooperating instead. We also use our modification to predict a tradeoff between the robustness and the benefit of cooperation in the PD.</dcterms:abstract>
    <cb:paper>
      <cb:simpleTitle>Strategic Choice of Preferences: The Persona Model</cb:simpleTitle>
      <cb:occurrenceDate>2010-09-29T09:25:59Z</cb:occurrenceDate>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Abstract</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/wp/wp2010/wp1010.htm</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>David Newth</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>David H. Wolpert</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Julian Jamison</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Michael Harre</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:byline>David H. Wolpert, Julian Jamison, David Newth, and Michael Harre</cb:byline>
      <cb:publicationDate>2010-09</cb:publicationDate>
      <cb:publication>Boston Fed Working papers</cb:publication>
      <cb:JELCode>C70</cb:JELCode>
      <cb:JELCode>C72</cb:JELCode>
      <cb:JELCode>D03</cb:JELCode>
    </cb:paper>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

