<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:cb="http://www.cbwiki.net/wiki/index.php/Specification_1.1" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://www.bis.org/cbhub/list/author/author_2012/index.rss">
    <title>Central Bank Research Hub - Papers by John F. Cogan</title>
    <link>http://www.bis.org/cbhub/list/author/author_2012/index.rss</link>
    <description>Research hub papers by author John F. Cogan</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li resource="http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp1090.pdf" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp1090.pdf">
    <title>05Oct/New Keynesian versus old Keynesian government spending multipliers</title>
    <link>http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp1090.pdf</link>
    <description>European Central Bank Working papers by John F. Cogan, Tobias Cwik, John B. Taylor, Volker Wieland</description>
    <dc:title>New Keynesian versus old Keynesian government spending multipliers</dc:title>
    <dc:date>2009-10-05T12:39:00Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract>(JEL: C52, E62) Renewed interest in fiscal policy has increased the use of quantitative models to evaluate policy. Because of modelling uncertainty, it is essential that policy evaluations be robust to alternative assumptions. We find that models currently being used in practice to evaluate fiscal policy stimulus proposals are not robust. Government spending multipliers in an alternative empirically-estimated and widely-cited new Keynesian model are much smaller than in these old Keynesian models; the estimated stimulus is extremely small with GDP and employment effects only one-sixth as large.</dcterms:abstract>
    <cb:paper>
      <cb:simpleTitle>New Keynesian versus old Keynesian government spending multipliers</cb:simpleTitle>
      <cb:occurrenceDate>2009-10-05T12:39:00Z</cb:occurrenceDate>
      <cb:institutionAbbrev>ECB</cb:institutionAbbrev>
      <cb:resource>
        <cb:title>Full text</cb:title>
        <cb:link>http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp1090.pdf</cb:link>
        <cb:description />
      </cb:resource>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Volker Wieland</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>Tobias Cwik</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>John F. Cogan</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:person type="author">
        <cb:nameAsWritten>John B. Taylor</cb:nameAsWritten>
      </cb:person>
      <cb:byline>John F. Cogan, Tobias Cwik, John B. Taylor, Volker Wieland</cb:byline>
      <cb:publicationDate>2009-09-17</cb:publicationDate>
      <cb:publication>European Central Bank Working papers</cb:publication>
      <cb:JELCode>C52</cb:JELCode>
      <cb:JELCode>E62</cb:JELCode>
    </cb:paper>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

